<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>No Biomass Burn &#187; alcohol fuels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.nobiomassburn.org/category/types/alcohol-fuels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.nobiomassburn.org</link>
	<description>Confronting the false energy solutions of biomass energy</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Apr 2011 23:02:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>EcoLaw Factsheet: Biomass is not Clean or Green</title>
		<link>http://www.nobiomassburn.org/2010/01/ecolaw-factsheet-biomass-is-not-clean-or-green/</link>
		<comments>http://www.nobiomassburn.org/2010/01/ecolaw-factsheet-biomass-is-not-clean-or-green/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Jan 2010 12:03:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>tanuki</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[agrofuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alcohol fuels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[landfill waste]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wood and forests]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.nobiomassburn.org/?p=16</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[FACT: Burning biomass for energy is “dirtier” than burning coal. Burning biomass emits large amounts of air pollution, and endangers human health. · Biomass burning is dirtier than burning coal. Per unit of power generated, burning wood emits 1.25-3.0 times as much carbon CO2 (the most important greenhouse gas) as coal.[1] · Biomass burning emits [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: large;"><strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><br />
</span></strong></span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FACT: </span></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">Burning biomass for energy is “dirtier” than burning coal. Burning biomass emits large amounts of air pollution, and endangers human health.</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Biomass burning</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> is dirtier than burning coal. </span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Per unit of power generated, burning wood emits 1.25-3.0 times as much carbon CO</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> (the most important greenhouse gas) as coal.</span><a name="_ftnref1"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn1">[1]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Biomass burning emits more</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> PM [particulate matter] as coal, </span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">a pollutant associated with asthma, heart disease, and cancer.</span><a name="_ftnref2"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn2">[2]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Wood or trash burning biomass incinerators typically increase ground level ozone. </span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Burning biomass produces hundreds of tons of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs), two ingredients of the </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">ground-level ozone</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> that</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> causes asthma in children and exacerbates other pulmonary and cardiac disease problems.</span><a name="_ftnref3"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn3">[3]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Biomass energy is woefully inefficient</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">, averaging only 26</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">% efficiency. Thus, 76% of the energy in the wood burned is wasted.  However, 100% of the wood burned generates pollution.</span><a name="_ftnref4"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn4">[4]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FACT: </span></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">Burni</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">ng biomass to </span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">generat</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">e</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> electricity is not ca</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">rbon neutral. Under current or proposed laws biomass burning</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> will dramatically increase greenhouse gases</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> because the emissions are higher than coal per unit of power produced, and, because of the “biomass loophole</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">”</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">, the CO</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2 </span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">emissions from these plants are reported by EPA on e-grid as zero</span></em></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">.</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> is </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> Every molecule has the same</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> negative effect regardless of the source, whether it is from a tailpipe or a smokestack</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">So called “biogenic” carbon in the atmosphere causes just as much harm as every other type of </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">. </span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">The amount of car</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">bon in the biosphere is fixed. I</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">t is the percentage in the atmosphere in the next 20-30 years that will determine what happens to the world climate. Human burning of biomass is not part of the “normal” carbon cycle.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">We can’t grow the trees fast enough.</span></strong> <span style="font-size: x-small;">The assumption used to be that the trees could grow back fast enough that burning would not cause a significant rise in atmospheric </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> levels. That is not true. In April, 2009 the EPA reversed itself and invalidated that concept by stating that:</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">“…</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">for a given amount of </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> released today, … 30 percent will be removed over a few centuries, and the remaining 20 percent will only slowly decay over time such that it will take many thousands of years to remove from the atmosphere.”</span> <span style="font-size: xx-small;">Federal Register, Vol 74, p 18899, 4/24/2009.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">“Maintaining the exemption for </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> under the protocol [Kyoto] wrongly treats all biomass sources as carbon neutral, even if the source involves clearing forests for electricity. </span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">For example, the clearing of long-established forests to burn wood or to grow energy crops is counted as a 100% reduction in emissions despite causing large carbon emissions. Replacing fossil fuels with bioenergy does not by itself reduce carbon emissions.” </span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">Searchinger, et.al., Science 326: 527, 2009.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FACT: </span></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">Greenhouse gas emissions from biomass incinerators are significant and will undermine initial efforts to cut US greenhouse gas emissions.</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">If the renewable energy targets for 2020 are</span></strong> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">met then the burning of wood and trash will cause the emissions of 700,000,000 tons of </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> each year.</span></strong><a name="_ftnref5"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn5">[5]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">This </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2 </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">won’t be “counted”</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> b</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">ecause biomass is considered </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">a “</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">renewable energy source</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">”</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> by </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">all </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">the Congressional climate bill</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">s.</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">This means the </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> is ignored by the law and is not regulated.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">This “loophole” effectively reduces the </span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> emissions r</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">eductions in 2020 from 17% to less than 5</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">%.</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> This is a ser</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">i</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">ous setback in efforts to control climate change before irreversible thresholds or biological tipping points are breached.</span><a name="_ftnref6"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn6">[6]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FACT: </span></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">Biomass harvesting over-exploits forests and degrades their vital ability to remove carbon from the atmosphere</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">A single 50-megawatt biomass plant burns about 650,000 tons of trees a year</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">, over a ton of wood a minute.</span><a name="_ftnref7"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn7">[7]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Biomass plants don’t just burn forestry “waste” (tops and branches) – </span><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">they burn whole trees</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> which are then chipped</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> </span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Mature trees sequester more carbon than newly planted trees</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">, even though young trees appear to grow faster.</span><a name="_ftnref8"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn8">[8]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">Cutting and burning a tree is a “double whammy” for the environment</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">. The tree is no longer taking CO</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">2 out of the atmosphere </span><em><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">and</span></span></em><span style="font-size: x-small;"> burning the wood produces an acute spike in </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">CO</span><span style="font-size: xx-small;">2</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">levels.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><span style="font-size: small;">FACT: </span></strong><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;">Biomass energy wastes water and pollutes rivers</span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><strong><em><span style="font-size: small;"> </span></em></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">A large-scale biomass plant requires close to a million gallons</span></strong><strong><span style="font-size: x-small;"> a day of water for cooling</span></strong><span style="font-size: x-small;">.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Hundreds of thousands of gallons of this water are vaporized in the cooling process.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Plant cooling needs and water takings are greatest in summer when high temperatures already reduce river flows and stress native fish.</span><a name="_ftnref9"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn9">[9]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Impacts of water takings will worsen as climate warming and droughts further stress rivers.</span><a name="_ftnref10"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn10">[10]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Logging </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">impacts</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"> water quality. E</span><span style="font-size: x-small;">quipment tears up soils, leading to erosion and </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">siltation in </span><span style="font-size: x-small;">streams.</span><a name="_ftnref11"></a><a href="http://docs.google.com/Doc?docid=0ATONl2I72FP_ZGNoajk3d3ZfMTRraG1qa2pmcQ&amp;hl=en#_ftn11">[11]</a></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: x-small;">·</span> <span style="font-size: x-small;">Heavily contaminated boiler “blow down” (rinse water) is pumped back into rivers at unnaturally high temperatures, making waters too warm and polluted for native coldwater fish.</span></p>
<p style="text-align: justify;"><span style="font-size: small;">EcoLaw December, 2009</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.nobiomassburn.org/2010/01/ecolaw-factsheet-biomass-is-not-clean-or-green/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->
